I don’t get it. Why did my professor send my class to this gallery? Was it to show me that using the banal/ordinary life as subject matter, though already done in the 1950s/60s, could still me done? To assure my peers that their lackluster painting skills would enable them to be accepted into a gallery? To see how much I could write about«the most interesting» painting while in stuffy, non air-conditioned room. To confuse in showing me that work I obviously have a low opinion of could be the recipient of the Krasner-Pollock grant? Or was it to amuse me in sending me to a gallery that attracts the types of people who touch the artwork? I’m not sure. Oh and I’m giving this two stars because I looked up a past show of theirs that featured a photo of a girl in pink sweatpants that say«Sexy» on the back and I think that’s funny.