Wilson-Hoss Robert D Atty

Title: Lawyer Robert D. Wilson-​Hoss (Shelton, WA — WSBA #8620) pressured Shadowood Directors to purchase an unneeded service.
I am the VP of the Board of Shadowood Homeowners Association (SHA) Shelton, WA, and so am a client of Robert D. Wilson-​Hoss (Shelton, WA — WSBA #8620) who provided a service to SHA that in my opinion we simply did not need. I am not speaking for the board as a whole.
The issue in question was whether a bank foreclosing on one of our lots could extinguish our lien rights forever. Wilson-​Hoss claimed in his 10÷14÷14 letter to the Board that if we ignored the suit «…the bank would have taken a judgment extinguishing all of Shadowood’s rights in the lot. Including its covenant rights.» In my opinion this is blatantly false for the following reasons:
1. The covenants predated the deed of trust.
2. The allegation in the lawsuit simply said no such thing («have a claim … by virtue of Covenants …» and
«…such CLAIM … is … inferior … to … the Deed of Trust».).
3. The prayer for relief in the lawsuit simply said no such thing («That by the foreclosure and sale, the rights of each of the Defendants and persons claiming by, through or under them SUBSEQUENT to the execution of Plaintiff’s Deed of Trust, be adjudged inferior …»).
4. We already had the protection we needed in our 1980 CC&R 22, which explicitly prohibits foreclosures from extinguishing lien rights.
5. Case law such as Lake Limerick v. Hunt Homes 120 Wn. App. 246 (2004) (where Hunt claimed he did not have to pay dues) says «Hunt would be unjustly enriched if it could retain that benefit without paying for it, and THUS THE LAW WILL IMPLY A CONTRACT TO PAY DUES.» What is exceptionally noteworthy about this case is that LAKE LIMERICK WAS REPRESENTED BY NONE OTHER THAN WILSON-​HOSS HIMSELF.
Hunt wound up paying Wilson-Hoss’s fees, and Lake Limerick got their back dues with interest. Obviously Wilson-​Hoss knew how false his 10÷14÷14 claim about our case was. I will leave it to the reader to figure out if the facts here support a charge of fraud against Wilson-​Hoss, given that his very own case conclusively proves how wrong he was, in my opinion.
For complete details Google this: Rob Wilson-​Hoss Shadowood