Sonic

I know several people who have
and all have told me how good the service is and having visited a friend’s home who has it, I have to agree. For DSL, it’s faster and more solid than AT&T. AT&T offers internet speeds of 6megs while sonic is 10megs with some areas reaching up to 20megs.
I don’t understand how a smaller carrier Sonic versus a much larger one AT&T both functioning on a copper network is delivering better and faster service and is cheaper too.
There’s also the little known fact that AT&T has monthly metered broadband cap of 150 gigabytes for DSL (250 gigs for U-​VERSE) and for every 50 gigs a subscriber goes over, they are charged $ 10. Sonic does not. With cord cutting on the rise, services like Netflix, Amazon Fire TV coming online are competing with traditional television and cable services and not to mention video conferencing, websites such as YOU TUBE and internet connected gaming consoles, a monthly 150 gigabyte cap is not enough.
Does anyone see a problem with this?
It’s all over the news that AT&T and Verizon want to exit the fixed line business and going state by state trying to either sell off their unwanted DSL copper networks to smaller carriers like Century, Frontier, Fairpoint, Windstream or Sonic or outright abandoning them.
New technologies like G-​FAST and VDSL is making use of the existing old telephone copper system making it faster and prolonging its use.
I hope CEO Dane Jasper is reading this: If AT&T and Verizon are selling their DSL networks, please come to Pacifica California.

I just spent an hour on the phone with a customer support rep who was helpful, patient, and answered all of my questions clearly and concisely. You can’t ask for much better service.